↓ Skip to main content

Managing the changing burden of cancer in Asia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Managing the changing burden of cancer in Asia
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan, Kunnambath Ramadas, You-lin Qiao

Abstract

Asia accounts for 60% of the world population and half the global burden of cancer. The incidence of cancer cases is estimated to increase from 6.1 million in 2008 to 10.6 million in 2030, due to ageing and growing populations, lifestyle and socioeconomic changes. Striking variations in ethnicity, sociocultural practices, human development index, habits and dietary patterns are reflected in the burden and pattern of cancer in different regions. The existing and emerging cancer patterns and burden in different regions of Asia call for political recognition of cancer as an important public health problem and for balanced investments in public and professional awareness. Prevention as well as early detection of cancers leads to both better health outcomes and considerable savings in treatment costs. Cancer health services are still evolving, and require substantial investment to ensure equitable access to cancer care for all sections of the population. In this review, we discuss the changing burden of cancer in Asia, along with appropriate management strategies. Strategies should promote healthy ageing via healthy lifestyles, tobacco and alcohol control measures, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, cancer screening services, and vertical investments in strengthening cancer healthcare infrastructure to improve equitable access to services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 21 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#888,889
of 13,703,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#719
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,509
of 256,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#115
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,703,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.