↓ Skip to main content

Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-8-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J Kierans, KS Joseph, Zhong-Cheng Luo, Robert Platt, Russell Wilkins, Michael S Kramer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Other 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,106
of 4,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,122
of 157,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them