↓ Skip to main content

Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-8-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J Kierans, KS Joseph, Zhong-Cheng Luo, Robert Platt, Russell Wilkins, Michael S Kramer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Unspecified 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#1,892,541
of 7,754,592 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#717
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,158
of 98,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,754,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 62nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.