↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie Anna McGinn, Sonya Grenier, Julie Duplantie, Nicola Shaw, Claude Sicotte, Luc Mathieu, Yvan Leduc, France Légaré, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 4%
Canada 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Saudi Arabia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 357 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 112 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 18%
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Other 97 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 32%
Computer Science 74 19%
Social Sciences 43 11%
Unspecified 39 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 37 9%
Other 77 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,412,879
of 13,288,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,357
of 2,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,137
of 266,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,288,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them