↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie Anna McGinn, Sonya Grenier, Julie Duplantie, Nicola Shaw, Claude Sicotte, Luc Mathieu, Yvan Leduc, France Légaré, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 597 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 142 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 14%
Researcher 67 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 7%
Other 125 20%
Unknown 116 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 24%
Computer Science 88 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 55 9%
Social Sciences 51 8%
Other 78 12%
Unknown 146 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,948,808
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,251
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,488
of 112,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.