↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators in the provision of post-abortion care at district level in central Uganda – a qualitative study focusing on task sharing between physicians and midwives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators in the provision of post-abortion care at district level in central Uganda – a qualitative study focusing on task sharing between physicians and midwives
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandira Paul, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Charles Kiggundu, Rebecka Namugenyi, Marie Klingberg-Allvin

Abstract

Abortion is restricted in Uganda, and poor access to contraceptive methods result in unwanted pregnancies. This leaves women no other choice than unsafe abortion, thus placing a great burden on the Ugandan health system and making unsafe abortion one of the major contributors to maternal mortality and morbidity in Uganda. The existing sexual and reproductive health policy in Uganda supports the sharing of tasks in post-abortion care. This task sharing is taking place as a pragmatic response to the increased workload. This study aims to explore physicians' and midwives' perception of post-abortion care with regard to professional competences, methods, contraceptive counselling and task shifting/sharing in post-abortion care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 281 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 23%
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 72 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 20%
Social Sciences 34 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 77 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,701,998
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,934
of 8,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,120
of 323,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#66
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.