↓ Skip to main content

Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavel V Ovseiko, Axel Heitmueller, Pauline Allen, Stephen M Davies, Glenn Wells, Gary A Ford, Ara Darzi, Alastair M Buchan

Abstract

As in many countries around the world, there are high expectations on academic health science centres and networks in England to provide high-quality care, innovative research, and world-class education, while also supporting wealth creation and economic growth. Meeting these expectations increasingly depends on partnership working between university medical schools and teaching hospitals, as well as other healthcare providers. However, academic-clinical relationships in England are still characterised by the "unlinked partners" model, whereby universities and their partner teaching hospitals are neither fiscally nor structurally linked, creating bifurcating accountabilities to various government and public agencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 6%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,134,067
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#798
of 8,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,238
of 319,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.