↓ Skip to main content

Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-9-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Priebe, Alexandra Burton, Deborah Ashby, Richard Ashcroft, Tom Burns, Anthony David, Sandra Eldridge, Mike Firn, Martin Knapp, Rose McCabe

Abstract

Various interventions have been tested to achieve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients with psychotic disorders, and there is no consistent evidence for the effectiveness of any established intervention. The effectiveness of financial incentives in improving adherence to a range of treatments has been demonstrated; no randomised controlled trial however has tested the use of financial incentives to achieve medication adherence for patients with psychotic disorders living in the community.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Psychology 36 26%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 21 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,649,955
of 14,208,852 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,924
of 3,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,517
of 251,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,208,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.