↓ Skip to main content

Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-9-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Priebe, Alexandra Burton, Deborah Ashby, Richard Ashcroft, Tom Burns, Anthony David, Sandra Eldridge, Mike Firn, Martin Knapp, Rose McCabe

Abstract

Various interventions have been tested to achieve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients with psychotic disorders, and there is no consistent evidence for the effectiveness of any established intervention. The effectiveness of financial incentives in improving adherence to a range of treatments has been demonstrated; no randomised controlled trial however has tested the use of financial incentives to achieve medication adherence for patients with psychotic disorders living in the community.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 18%
Brazil 3 18%
Australia 1 6%
Norway 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Romania 1 6%
Spain 1 6%
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 153%
Student > Master 23 135%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 94%
Student > Postgraduate 14 82%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 59%
Other 34 200%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 235%
Psychology 36 212%
Social Sciences 13 76%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 41%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 24%
Other 15 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,634,823
of 14,177,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,921
of 3,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,477
of 251,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,177,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.