↓ Skip to main content

Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-9-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Priebe, Alexandra Burton, Deborah Ashby, Richard Ashcroft, Tom Burns, Anthony David, Sandra Eldridge, Mike Firn, Martin Knapp, Rose McCabe

Abstract

Various interventions have been tested to achieve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients with psychotic disorders, and there is no consistent evidence for the effectiveness of any established intervention. The effectiveness of financial incentives in improving adherence to a range of treatments has been demonstrated; no randomised controlled trial however has tested the use of financial incentives to achieve medication adherence for patients with psychotic disorders living in the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 173 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 18%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 26%
Psychology 42 23%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,402,674
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,797
of 4,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,318
of 93,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.