↓ Skip to main content

Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annie McCluskey, Sandy Middleton

Abstract

Transferring knowledge from research into practice can be challenging, partly because the process involves a change in attitudes, roles and behaviour by individuals and teams. Helping teams to identify then target potential barriers may aid the knowledge transfer process. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers, as perceived by allied health professionals, to delivering an evidence-based (Level 1) outdoor journey intervention for people with stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Unspecified 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 34 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 20%
Unspecified 15 15%
Psychology 10 10%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Other 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,383,118
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,719
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,539
of 190,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.