↓ Skip to main content

Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Hermann, Mathias Ried-Larsen, Andreas Kryger Jensen, René Holst, Lars Bo Andersen, Søren Overgaard, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen

Abstract

To validate physical activity estimates by the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared with indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the hip pre or post total hip arthroplasty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Engineering 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,554,240
of 5,036,385 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,403
of 1,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,932
of 126,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#108
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,036,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.