↓ Skip to main content

Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Hermann, Mathias Ried-Larsen, Andreas Kryger Jensen, René Holst, Lars Bo Andersen, Søren Overgaard, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen

Abstract

To validate physical activity estimates by the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared with indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the hip pre or post total hip arthroplasty.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,121
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,749
of 224,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#83
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.