↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Patients’ Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne S Paton, Anne Roberts, Graham K Bruce, Jonathan Marsden

Abstract

Previous work has found that people with diabetes do not wear their therapeutic footwear as directed, but the thinking behind this behaviour is unclear. Adherence to therapeutic footwear advice must improve in order to reduce foot ulceration and amputation risk in people with diabetes and neuropathy. Therefore this study aimed to explore the psychological influences and personal experiences behind the daily footwear selection of individuals with diabetes and neuropathy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Unspecified 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Unspecified 8 13%
Psychology 7 11%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 11 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,879,886
of 12,991,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#175
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,339
of 187,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,991,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them