↓ Skip to main content

Patients' Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Patients' Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne S Paton, Anne Roberts, Graham K Bruce, Jonathan Marsden

Abstract

Previous work has found that people with diabetes do not wear their therapeutic footwear as directed, but the thinking behind this behaviour is unclear. Adherence to therapeutic footwear advice must improve in order to reduce foot ulceration and amputation risk in people with diabetes and neuropathy. Therefore this study aimed to explore the psychological influences and personal experiences behind the daily footwear selection of individuals with diabetes and neuropathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 23%
Psychology 9 8%
Engineering 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 28%