↓ Skip to main content

Network-based social capital and capacity-building programs: an example from Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Network-based social capital and capacity-building programs: an example from Ethiopia
Published in
Human Resources for Health, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-8-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoba Ramanadhan, Sosena Kebede, Jeannie Mantopoulos, Elizabeth H Bradley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Ethiopia 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Researcher 12 14%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#855
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,927
of 103,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.