↓ Skip to main content

Network-based social capital and capacity-building programs: an example from Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Network-based social capital and capacity-building programs: an example from Ethiopia
Published in
Human Resources for Health, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-8-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoba Ramanadhan, Sosena Kebede, Jeannie Mantopoulos, Elizabeth H Bradley

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 6%
Ethiopia 2 3%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 12 17%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Unspecified 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,040,362
of 8,094,378 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#322
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,975
of 148,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,094,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.