↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical testing of a device for subcutaneous internal anterior pelvic ring fixation versus external pelvic ring fixation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical testing of a device for subcutaneous internal anterior pelvic ring fixation versus external pelvic ring fixation
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg Osterhoff, Simon Tiziani, Stephen J Ferguson, Gregor Spreiter, Max J Scheyerer, Gian-Leza Spinas, Guido A Wanner, Hans-Peter Simmen, Clément ML Werner

Abstract

Although useful in the emergency treatment of pelvic ring injuries, external fixation is associated with pin tract infections, the patient's limited mobility and a restricted surgical accessibility to the lower abdomen. In this study, the mechanical stability of a subcutaneous internal anterior fixation (SIAF) system is investigated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 23%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 73%
Engineering 4 15%
Unspecified 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,926,076
of 6,228,670 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,092
of 1,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,828
of 133,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#62
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,228,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.