↓ Skip to main content

Management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: a review
Published in
Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-2897-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne Hunt, Steve A Frost, Ken Hillman, Phillip J Newton, Patricia M Davidson

Abstract

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of developing of intra abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).Aim: This review seeks to define IAH and ACS, identify the aetiology and presentation of IAH and ACS, identify IAP measurement techniques, identify current management and discuss the implications of IAH and ACS for nursing practice. A search of the electronic databases was supervised by a health librarian. The electronic data bases Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); Medline, EMBASE, and the World Wide Web was undertaken from 1996- January 2011 using MeSH and key words which included but not limited to: abdominal compartment syndrome, intra -abdominal hypertension, intra-abdominal pressure in adult populations met the search criteria and were reviewed by three authors using a critical appraisal tool. Data derived from the retrieved material are discussed under the following themes: (1) etiology of intra-abdominal hypertension; (2) strategies for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (3) the manifestation of abdominal compartment syndrome; and (4) the importance of nursing assessment, observation and interventions. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have the potential to alter organ perfusion and compromise organ function.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 19%
Other 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,001,286
of 14,155,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes
#13
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,805
of 191,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,155,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them