↓ Skip to main content

Hyphema is a risk factor for failure of trabeculectomy in neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Hyphema is a risk factor for failure of trabeculectomy in neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective analysis
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2415-14-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shunji Nakatake, Shigeo Yoshida, Shintaro Nakao, Ryoichi Arita, Miho Yasuda, Takeshi Kita, Hiroshi Enaida, Yuji Ohshima, Tatsuro Ishibashi

Abstract

Several retinal ischemic diseases can cause neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) is a relatively better treatment modality in the management of eyes with NVG than other glaucoma surgeries. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that may influence the outcome of trabeculectomy with MMC for NVG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,293
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#1,532
of 2,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,943
of 226,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.