RT @steph_coen: EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE…
RT @steph_coen: EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE…
RT @steph_coen: EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE…
RT @steph_coen: EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE…
RT @steph_coen: EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE…
EXHIBIT C: In my work with @CochraneSGMG, we found that only 19% of RCTs reported any aspect of sex/gender IN THE ARTICLE TITLE. (@vawelch @marion_doull et al: https://t.co/Cona5lWqdC) 4/10 https://t.co/IDXxRWd5FP
From a 2017 study of clinical trials in Canada. Only 4% of studies actually examine results by sex...but we KNOW results can be v different! @CCriadoPerez has really opened my eyes to this. I can't unsee it now! And it's terrifying! (study can be found at
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
RT @CochraneSGMG: @realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r O…
@realscientists We've done some work on how sex/gender is reported in Canadian clinical trials: https://t.co/dBWndDTd6r Only 6% of studies we examined performed subgroup analyses by sex, and only 4% reported sex-disaggregated data. @vawelch @steph_coen @ma
RT @MedicalEvidence: Research highlights poor uptake of sex & gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context - #RIPRjournal: https://t.c…
RT @charlesweijer: Do #RCTs in #Canada report #sex/gender? @vawelch shows most do but only 6% conduct #subgroup analysis to look for differ…
Do #RCTs in #Canada report #sex/gender? @vawelch shows most do but only 6% conduct #subgroup analysis to look for differential effects. https://t.co/7ZD05dftXt
Reporting of sex & gender in RCTs in Canada - a cross-sectional methods study via #RIPRjournal: https://t.co/1rsVTCqbI7
RT @MedicalEvidence: Research highlights poor uptake of sex & gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context - #RIPRjournal: https://t.c…
Research highlights poor uptake of sex & gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context - #RIPRjournal: https://t.co/1rsVTCHMzF
RT @CochraneSGMG: Assessing the extent of reporting about sex and/or gender in Canadian RCTs - just published https://t.co/Gh5rB1sEEc
Assessing the extent of reporting about sex and/or gender in Canadian RCTs - just published https://t.co/Gh5rB1sEEc
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
An interesting reading, have you specifically reported sex/gender in RCTs? Or subgroup analysis across sex? https://t.co/s8Esb4TwtH
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
Assessing the extent of reporting about sex and/or gender in Canadian RCTs .https://t.co/QAxxhulwo2
Assessing the extent of reporting about sex and/or gender in Canadian RCTs .https://t.co/txBIwwJqKo
A reminder that just reporting sex breakdown in studies is not enough. We need to compare the groups. https://t.co/bE3fwGRsv9
#HLTC02 #HealthStudies students take note https://t.co/4IgS8qEaTR
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
"...sex and gender in randomized controlled trials in Canada" #sex #gender not defined, not analysed https://t.co/LDy0qp5ba2 #riprjournal
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @Karen_Patte: "Findings highlight poor uptake of sex & gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context" https://t.co/bPleeUxIZk
RT @steph_coen: Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClayto…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
RT @steph_coen: Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClayto…
RT @steph_coen: Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClayto…
RT @steph_coen: Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClayto…
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
"Findings highlight poor uptake of sex & gender considerations in the Canadian RCT context" https://t.co/bPleeUxIZk
RT @LiisaGalea: We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are…
We need to get past inclusion to analyses: 98% of 🇨🇦 RCTs included both sexes but only 6% did subgroup analyses. Women are not tiny men https://t.co/1hFYEzhChY
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
RT @steph_coen: Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClayto…
Hey #gender friends! Our new paper may b of interest @hwitteman @RySciDean @asek47 @prof_goldberg @MHendr1cks @JanineClaytonMD @DrLoriBrotto https://t.co/xgOBRF87nj
@LiisaGalea - may be of interest https://t.co/xgOBRF87nj
RT @steph_coen: Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg…
Our new paper is out! "Reporting of sex and #gender in #RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study" https://t.co/exkFg4Cg2H @vawelch
RT @uOttawaCGH: just published! Reporting of sex and gender in RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study https://t.co/SGcc0e4Tmc
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
RT @uOttawaCGH: just published! Reporting of sex and gender in RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study https://t.co/SGcc0e4Tmc
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
RT @vawelch: Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf
just published! Reporting of sex and gender in RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study https://t.co/SGcc0e4Tmc
just published! Reporting of sex and gender in RCTs in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study https://t.co/6GvyYQfxuC
Sex/gender reporting in randomized trials from Cochrane Sex/Gender Methods Group @cochraneequity https://t.co/awhOmDZbnf