↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a chronic disease self-management program on health care utilization in rural communities: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Impact of a chronic disease self-management program on health care utilization in rural communities: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan B Jaglal, Sara JT Guilcher, Gillian Hawker, Wendy Lou, Nancy M Salbach, Michael Manno, Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

Internationally, chronic disease self-management programs (CDSMPs) have been widely promoted with the assumption that confident, knowledgeable patients practicing self-management behavior will experience improved health and utilize fewer healthcare resources. However, there is a paucity of published data supporting this claim and the majority of the evidence is based on self-report.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Computer Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,762,339
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,895
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,109
of 193,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.