↓ Skip to main content

Preventing the development of depression at work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of universal interventions in the workplace

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Preventing the development of depression at work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of universal interventions in the workplace
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leona Tan, Min-Jung Wang, Matthew Modini, Sadhbh Joyce, Arnstein Mykletun, Helen Christensen, Samuel B Harvey

Abstract

Depression is a major public health problem among working-age adults. The workplace is potentially an important location for interventions aimed at preventing the development of depression, but to date, the mental health impact of universal interventions in the workplace has been unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 22%
Unspecified 33 16%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 33 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#276,153
of 13,396,110 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#235
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,568
of 188,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them