↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-7-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel A Radford, Karl B Landorf, Rachelle Buchbinder, Catherine Cook

Abstract

Plantar heel pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders of the foot and ankle. Treatment of the condition is usually conservative, however the effectiveness of many treatments frequently used in clinical practice, including supportive taping of the foot, has not been established. We performed a participant-blinded randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of low-Dye taping, a commonly used short-term treatment for plantar heel pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 21%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 13 6%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 18%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,915,871
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,524
of 4,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,494
of 84,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them