| Title |
Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-8-175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Korine Scheeres, Michel Wensing, Gijs Bleijenberg, Johan L Severens |
| Abstract |
This study investigated the costs and outcomes of implementing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a mental health center (MHC). CBT is an evidence-based treatment for CFS that was scarcely available until now. To investigate the possibilities for wider implementation, a pilot implementation project was set up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| France | 2 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,683,648
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,226
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,119
of 82,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.