↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Van Damme, Robert Arnou, Froukje Kafeja, Anne Fiquet, Patrick Richard, Stéphane Thomas, Gilles Meghlaoui, Sandrine Isabelle Samson, Emilio Ledesma

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,538,395
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,581
of 7,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,226
of 96,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.