↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Van Damme, Robert Arnou, Froukje Kafeja, Anne Fiquet, Patrick Richard, Stéphane Thomas, Gilles Meghlaoui, Sandrine Isabelle Samson, Emilio Ledesma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,927,817
of 23,661,575 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,605
of 7,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,333
of 97,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,661,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.