Title |
A new Cretaceous genus of xyelydid sawfly illuminating nygmata evolution in Hymenoptera
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-131 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mei Wang, Alexandr P Rasnitsyn, Chungkun Shih, Dong Ren |
Abstract |
Nygmata are prominent glandular structures on the wings of insects. They have been documented in some extant insects, including several families of Neuroptera and Mecoptera, the majority of Trichoptera, and a few of the hymenopteran Symphyta. However, because nygmata are rarely preserved in compression fossils, their early development and evolution are still enigmatic. For example, the only documented nygmata in the Hymenoptera are on the forewings of the Triassic xyelids Asioxyela paurura and Madygenius primitives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 60% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,438,907
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,447
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,467
of 231,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.