↓ Skip to main content

Practice nurse involvement in primary care depression management: an observational cost-effectiveness analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Practice nurse involvement in primary care depression management: an observational cost-effectiveness analysis
Published in
BMC Family Practice, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodi Gray, Hossein Haji Ali Afzali, Justin Beilby, Christine Holton, David Banham, Jonathan Karnon

Abstract

Most evidence on the effect of collaborative care for depression is derived in the selective environment of randomised controlled trials. In collaborative care, practice nurses may act as case managers. The Primary Care Services Improvement Project (PCSIP) aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative models of practice nurse involvement in a real world Australian setting. Previous analyses have demonstrated the value of high level practice nurse involvement in the management of diabetes and obesity. This paper reports on their value in the management of depression.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Psychology 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#9,906,422
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#1,035
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,733
of 191,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.