Title |
Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-230 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Мaxim L Golovakhа, Weniamin Orljanski, Karl-Peter Benedetto, Sergey Panchenko, Philippe Büchler, Philipp Henle, Emin Aghayev |
Abstract |
Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis and symptomatic varus malalignment. We hypothesized that different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for the various wedge sizes in a finite element (FE) analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 28% |
Researcher | 9 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 17 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,374,472
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,123
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,727
of 225,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#77
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.