↓ Skip to main content

Intervention randomized controlled trials involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Intervention randomized controlled trials involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamelia Tadjerbashi, Roberto S Rosales, Isam Atroshi

Abstract

Although arthroscopy of upper extremity joints was initially a diagnostic tool, it is increasingly used for therapeutic interventions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for assessing treatment efficacy. We aimed to review the literature for intervention RCTs involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 67%
Unspecified 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,943,285
of 4,755,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#728
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,750
of 116,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#43
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,755,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.