↓ Skip to main content

Volume Tracking: A new method for quantitative assessment and visualization of intracardiac blood flow from three-dimensional, time-resolved, three-component magnetic resonance velocity mapping

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 593)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Volume Tracking: A new method for quantitative assessment and visualization of intracardiac blood flow from three-dimensional, time-resolved, three-component magnetic resonance velocity mapping
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-11-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Töger, Marcus Carlsson, Gustaf Söderlind, Håkan Arheden, Einar Heiberg

Abstract

Functional and morphological changes of the heart influence blood flow patterns. Therefore, flow patterns may carry diagnostic and prognostic information. Three-dimensional, time-resolved, three-directional phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D PC-CMR) can image flow patterns with unique detail, and using new flow visualization methods may lead to new insights. The aim of this study is to present and validate a novel visualization method with a quantitative potential for blood flow from 4D PC-CMR, called Volume Tracking, and investigate if Volume Tracking complements particle tracing, the most common visualization method used today.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 39%
Engineering 12 19%
Computer Science 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,097,320
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#37
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,342
of 108,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.