↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the measurement properties of the Manchester foot pain and disability index

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the measurement properties of the Manchester foot pain and disability index
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babette C van der Zwaard, Caroline B Terwee, Edward Roddy, Berend Terluin, Henriette E van der Horst, Petra JM Elders

Abstract

The Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI, 19 items) was developed to measure functional limitations, pain and appearance for patients with foot pain and is frequently used in both observational studies and randomised controlled trials. A Dutch version of the MFPDI was developed. The aims of this study were to evaluate all the measurement properties for the Dutch version of the MFPDI and to evaluate comparability to the original version.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 9%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 44%
Unspecified 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,314,218
of 8,702,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,556
of 2,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,025
of 183,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#60
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,702,492 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.