↓ Skip to main content

The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Moutzouri, Evdokia Billis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Polixeni Kottika, Jacqueline A Oldham

Abstract

Mulligan's mobilisation techniques are thought to increase the range of movement (ROM) in patients with low back pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the application of the Mulligan's Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) technique on lumbar flexion ROM. The secondary aim was to measure the intra- and inter-day reliability of lumbar ROM employing the same procedure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Postgraduate 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Sports and Recreations 25 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 15 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,762,735
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,520
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,639
of 212,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.