↓ Skip to main content

The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Moutzouri, Evdokia Billis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Polixeni Kottika, Jacqueline A Oldham

Abstract

Mulligan's mobilisation techniques are thought to increase the range of movement (ROM) in patients with low back pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the application of the Mulligan's Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) technique on lumbar flexion ROM. The secondary aim was to measure the intra- and inter-day reliability of lumbar ROM employing the same procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Postgraduate 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 39 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 28%
Sports and Recreations 36 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 42 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,453
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,696
of 89,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.