↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and psychometric properties of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in a population-based sample of patients with myocardial infarction from the MONICA/KORA…

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility and psychometric properties of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in a population-based sample of patients with myocardial infarction from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry
Published in
Population Health Metrics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12963-014-0027-8
Authors

Inge Kirchberger, Kathrin Braitmayer, Michaela Coenen, Cornelia Oberhauser, Christa Meisinger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Unspecified 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Other 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2014.
All research outputs
#9,073,516
of 11,333,579 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#218
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,425
of 206,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,333,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.