↓ Skip to main content

Mothers' AdvocateS In the Community (MOSAIC)- non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: a cluster randomised trial in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Mothers' AdvocateS In the Community (MOSAIC)- non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: a cluster randomised trial in primary care
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela J Taft, Rhonda Small, Kelsey L Hegarty, Lyndsey F Watson, Lisa Gold, Judith A Lumley

Abstract

Effective interventions to increase safety and wellbeing of mothers experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) are scarce. As much attention is focussed on professional intervention, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of non-professional mentor support in reducing IPV and depression among pregnant and recent mothers experiencing, or at risk of IPV.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 346 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 16%
Student > Master 51 15%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 85 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 18%
Social Sciences 45 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 99 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,918,765
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,607
of 18,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,189
of 120,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#24
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.