| Title |
Dairy consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0215-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mu Chen, Qi Sun, Edward Giovannucci, Dariush Mozaffarian, JoAnn E Manson, Walter C Willett, Frank B Hu |
| Abstract |
The relation between consumption of different types of dairy and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between total dairy and individual types of dairy consumptions and incident T2D in US adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| Spain | 8 | 11% |
| Mexico | 7 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 464 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 139 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 166 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 532. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#47,706
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#59
of 4,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367
of 372,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.