RT @KSR_SysRev: In @cochranecollab reviews, ~30% of risk of #bias assessments for allocation concealment are not in line with Cochrane's Ha…
RT @KSR_SysRev: In @cochranecollab reviews, ~30% of risk of #bias assessments for allocation concealment are not in line with Cochrane's Ha…
RT @KSR_SysRev: In @cochranecollab reviews, ~30% of risk of #bias assessments for allocation concealment are not in line with Cochrane's Ha…
RT @KSR_SysRev: In @cochranecollab reviews, ~30% of risk of #bias assessments for allocation concealment are not in line with Cochrane's Ha…
In @cochranecollab reviews, ~30% of risk of #bias assessments for allocation concealment are not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance: https://t.co/F8iwwH3sRY via @JClinEpi Image: Propadalo et al 2019 #evidence #data #synthesis #RoB https://t.co/x6BrF
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review: https://t.co/F8iwwH3sRY via @BioMedCentral @UniWH #OA #bmcmedresmethodol #methodology #systematicreviews https://t.co/O2ICeWsBSh
Comment on Mathes T (2017): Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: https://t.co/jMHU2J46mB
RT @ShonaHLang: Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review https://t.co/F…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
“We have to go deeper” *BWRAAAMP* https://t.co/NqbTd8McZ4
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @JaanpEditor: Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/TnWDDrDVWk #…
RT @JaanpEditor: Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/TnWDDrDVWk #…
RT @JaanpEditor: Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/TnWDDrDVWk #…
RT @JaanpEditor: Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/TnWDDrDVWk #…
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/TnWDDrDVWk #bmcmedresmethodol Data extraction methods are not uniform nor are they well studied. Yet the methods are crucial to good evidence. @Wi
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review https://t.co/Fjn4nXaKl1
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
RT @dralisonjwright: Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProje…
Of course; & there will be errors in lots of areas in articles. The mad rush means that the literature is not clean, & we should not expect it to be. The review process is live & ongoing once the paper is out. The shame is that there is that on
Data extraction errors found to be pervasive in meta analysis https://t.co/QgMMxuazqj @AndyLane27 @IMLahart @GeorgeMetsios @wendy_nicholls @wlv_sport @wlv_psychology
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a method... https://t.co/1zroN3LxcN #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
Up to 50% error rate in data extraction for systematic reviews. Can automated feature extraction, as used in @HBCProject, do better? https://t.co/MRlcw9NIUm
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @SLouhimies: Food for thought: crucial step in #SystematicReviews, #DataExtraction. Impacts and importance of data extraction errors and…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @DrXaverius: NEVER TOO META https://t.co/MgQITGDjRo
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
Food for thought: crucial step in #SystematicReviews, #DataExtraction. Impacts and importance of data extraction errors and methods used in the results of #SystematicReviews in a need for urgent attention. https://t.co/3ECbvUWtax
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
NEVER TOO META https://t.co/MgQITGDjRo
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
RT @JelteWicherts: Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervas…
I remember when we were just beginning to do metaresearch... look how far we've come... :'D https://t.co/BWEAsMmWJV
Interesting, also in context of having extracted data myself. One issue from studies with multiple statistical data, is which result represents the main primary outcome. At least automatic extraction looks less bad now, I guess ;-) https://t.co/V4Hi3VVl0i
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
Meta-meta-meta study alert: Systematic review of earlier reviews of extraction errors in systematic reviews shows pervasive errors (up to 50% error rate) in the extraction of study results. https://t.co/8PmH3vT5yr #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @tlassers: Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26…
Does not compute: Analysis errors in #SystematicReviews frequently studied, ways to prevent them are not https://t.co/2v2em26FeU
Only half? Given the amount of extracted data per review and the amount of sources of errors... https://t.co/zsyawIhrZd
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
Frequency of data extraction errors & methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review https://t.co/ZqLEjWHHCH #systematicreviews
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
RT @hildabast: Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analys…
Today in #PassTheSmellingSalts: about half of systematic reviews have data extraction errors; these often affect meta-analyses; have "moderate" effect on conclusions. https://t.co/LXqqoDANXJ https://t.co/XuPRnmjflf