↓ Skip to main content

Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soo-Won Chae, Soung-Yon Kim, Haea Lee, Joung-Ro Yon, Juneyoung Lee, Seung-Ho Han

Abstract

Use of a baseplate with a smaller diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, especially in patients with a small glenoid or glenoid wear. However, the effect of a smaller baseplate on stability of the glenoid component has not been evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether a smaller baseplate (25 mm) is beneficial to the initial stability of the glenoid component compared to that with a baseplate of a commonly used size (29 mm).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Unspecified 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Unspecified 7 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#896,722
of 8,702,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#240
of 2,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,324
of 243,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#12
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,702,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.