| Title |
Unfavorable impact of cancer cachexia on activity of daily living and need for inpatient care in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan: a prospective longitudinal observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-017-3795-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tateaki Naito, Taro Okayama, Takashi Aoyama, Takuya Ohashi, Yoshiyuki Masuda, Madoka Kimura, Hitomi Shiozaki, Haruyasu Murakami, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Tetsuhiko Taira, Akira Ono, Kazushige Wakuda, Hisao Imai, Takuya Oyakawa, Takeshi Ishii, Shota Omori, Kazuhisa Nakashima, Masahiro Endo, Katsuhiro Omae, Keita Mori, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Akira Tanuma, Toshiaki Takahashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,250,756
of 24,710,887 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,282
of 8,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,989
of 449,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#54
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,710,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.