↓ Skip to main content

Necrotizing fasciitis – a diagnostic dilemma: two case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Necrotizing fasciitis – a diagnostic dilemma: two case reports
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-8-229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitrakrishnan Rayno Navinan, Jevon Yudhishdran, Thambyaiah Kandeepan, Aruna Kulatunga

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections can affect various tissue planes. Although predisposing etiologies are many, they mostly center on impaired immunity occurring directly or indirectly and loss of integrity of protective barriers which predispose to infection. The nonspecific presentation may delay diagnosis and favor high mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 48%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,737,508
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,903
of 3,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,500
of 227,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.