↓ Skip to main content

Suicide in South Asia: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Suicide in South Asia: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0358-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark JD Jordans, Anne Kaufman, Natassia F Brenman, Ramesh P Adhikari, Nagendra P Luitel, Wietse A Tol, Ivan Komproe

Abstract

ObjectiveGlobally, suicide is an important cause of mortality. In low- and middle income settings, it is difficult to find unequivocal data to establish suicide rates. The objective of this review is to synthesize the reporting of suicide incidence in six south Asian countries.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review combining peer-reviewed studies (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE) with in-country searches for grey literature in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, India, Nepal and Bangladesh. The review included mapping reported suicide rates, quality appraisals of the studies, use of definitions of suicide and means of committing suicide.ResultsIn total, 114 studies and reports were included in the review, including 50 peer-reviewed publications. Reported suicide rates varied widely from 0.43/100,000 to 331.0/100,000. The average suicide rate across studies was found to be high compared to the world average, however many studies were of poor quality or not representative. The majority of studies failed to explicitly define suicide (84% of the published articles and 92% of the grey literature documents). Poisoning and hanging were consistently the most common methods of committing suicide on the sub-continent.ConclusionsThe reported suicide rates in South Asia are high compared to the global average, but there is a paucity of reliable data on suicide rates in South Asia. Reports are likely to diminish rather than exaggerate the magnitude of suicide rates. There is an urgent need to establish new, or evaluate existing, national suicide surveillance systems in the South Asian countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Psychology 24 15%
Social Sciences 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,162,431
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,021
of 5,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,034
of 364,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#30
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.