↓ Skip to main content

Suicide in South Asia: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Suicide in South Asia: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0358-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark JD Jordans, Anne Kaufman, Natassia F Brenman, Ramesh P Adhikari, Nagendra P Luitel, Wietse A Tol, Ivan Komproe

Abstract

ObjectiveGlobally, suicide is an important cause of mortality. In low- and middle income settings, it is difficult to find unequivocal data to establish suicide rates. The objective of this review is to synthesize the reporting of suicide incidence in six south Asian countries.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review combining peer-reviewed studies (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE) with in-country searches for grey literature in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, India, Nepal and Bangladesh. The review included mapping reported suicide rates, quality appraisals of the studies, use of definitions of suicide and means of committing suicide.ResultsIn total, 114 studies and reports were included in the review, including 50 peer-reviewed publications. Reported suicide rates varied widely from 0.43/100,000 to 331.0/100,000. The average suicide rate across studies was found to be high compared to the world average, however many studies were of poor quality or not representative. The majority of studies failed to explicitly define suicide (84% of the published articles and 92% of the grey literature documents). Poisoning and hanging were consistently the most common methods of committing suicide on the sub-continent.ConclusionsThe reported suicide rates in South Asia are high compared to the global average, but there is a paucity of reliable data on suicide rates in South Asia. Reports are likely to diminish rather than exaggerate the magnitude of suicide rates. There is an urgent need to establish new, or evaluate existing, national suicide surveillance systems in the South Asian countries.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 27%
Psychology 13 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,302,479
of 9,272,034 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,001
of 2,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,064
of 246,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#34
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,272,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.