↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshio Naka, Daryl Jones, Ian Baldwin, Nigel Fealy, Samantha Bates, Hermann Goehl, Stanislao Morgera, Hans H Neumayer, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract

To test the ability of a novel super high-flux (SHF) membrane with a larger pore size to clear myoglobin from serum.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
China 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 22%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,942
of 6,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,992
of 139,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#42
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.