↓ Skip to main content

Anne O'Tate: A tool to support user-driven summarization, drill-down and browsing of PubMed search results

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Anne O'Tate: A tool to support user-driven summarization, drill-down and browsing of PubMed search results
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1747-5333-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil R Smalheiser, Wei Zhou, Vetle I Torvik

Abstract

PubMed is designed to provide rapid, comprehensive retrieval of papers that discuss a given topic. However, because PubMed does not organize the search output further, it is difficult for users to grasp an overview of the retrieved literature according to non-topical dimensions, to drill-down to find individual articles relevant to a particular individual's need, or to browse the collection.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
New Caledonia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 53 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 12%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 23 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Chemistry 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,037,647
of 4,510,149 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#4
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,274
of 149,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,510,149 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them