↓ Skip to main content

Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cosimo Tudisco, Salvatore Bisicchia, Eugenio Savarese, Roberto Fiori, Dario A Bartolucci, Salvatore Masala, Giovanni Simonetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Other 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,930,799
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,941
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,106
of 283,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#76
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.