@WaltFrench @jsm2334 It’s much worse for clinical studies https://t.co/3OS5TuXEnA.
@dr_benoy_n_shah Great question and thread. We focus on COI, but less on reproducibility which is an issue not just in primary research, in systematic reviews, and in guidelines, but also in the peer review process itself. https://t.co/LpYTxRo29v https://t
@oldnick53 @SahabiaAli @PinsolleT Les essais cliniques randomisés ont la même crise de reproductibilité que le reste de la science. En faire la source de dogmes non scientifiques car infalsifiables (K Popper) est une sottise. https://t.co/njVAvxflIr
Less than 50% of medical studies are reproducible. In other words, most medical research is bullshit. Link: https://t.co/Dv3SuQCARg "Less than half [of clinical critical care practices] had reproducible effects." @Mangan150
@AnotherGenro @zglorgy @LangeronLaurent @Enthoven_R Ah une nouvelle règle sortie du chapeau, joli. Donc à partir de n=combien on ne s'intéresse plus aux critères de reproductibilité? https://t.co/0ezlYv9UYe
RT @DavidAOliverJr: @ConceptualJames Most of what is published in medical journals is false and NEJM is one of the worst offenders; they st…
@ConceptualJames Most of what is published in medical journals is false and NEJM is one of the worst offenders; they stopped caring about 35 years ago: https://t.co/UcngO35tkE https://t.co/nwE5h4W7YF
@mlipsitch I'm sure you're aware there's a reproducibility crisis in health care research. When carefully evaluated, as much as 50% of published research is not reproducible. That's a serious problem or maybe even a crisis? https://t.co/Yrt7PB7tup
RT @ResearchMedics: Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review https://t.co/qWRbi8Sf4v
Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review https://t.co/qWRbi8Sf4v
@sarita Not yet mentioned, less than half of RCTs have reproducible results. https://t.co/JN2hPa15sZ To me it’s not either/or, but both/and-what-else? We are just at the very beginning of seeing what it means to really value RWE.
@imclean557 @ACTINOSProject @ThatDamonGuy @smh @marywardy @Unitedincomp Would refer you once more to this: Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review https://t.co/7ovyOYglTQ
@ACTINOSProject @ThatDamonGuy @smh @marywardy @Unitedincomp This is not (repeat *not*) a point about vaxxing. It's a point about science - medical science in particular - which, some would argue, is facing a bit of a crisis. Why? See the below: https://t.c
RT @coding2share: Among 275 articles examining clinical critical care research using randomized trials, less than half had #reproducible ef…
RT @BMCMedicine: Click here to read our recent scoping #review on reproducibility of #clinical research in #critical care https://t.co/U9QX…
Click here to read our recent scoping #review on reproducibility of #clinical research in #critical care https://t.co/U9QXzisYgL #clinicaltrialsday #ICTD2018 https://t.co/F8E1Wxt362
Very relevant work ... Perhaps there is value in being a "late adopter" ... Matches well with the dictum Often heard these days in Critical Care practice:..."less is more". https://t.co/vOj412csqf
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
Really exciting work! https://t.co/gc85Bbv1Vf
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
Among 275 articles examining clinical critical care research using randomized trials, less than half had #reproducible effects. #OpenScience https://t.co/xNVJmLkfba
Thx @craig_dale1 for the tweet Daniel Niven’s thesis work is amazing. Bright future ahead! https://t.co/p2N8RepsE1
RT @craig_dale1: When replicated, less than half of ICU studies have reproducible effects. Is there sufficient description of study care pr…
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
RT @craig_dale1: When replicated, less than half of ICU studies have reproducible effects. Is there sufficient description of study care pr…
RT @StelfoxTom: Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
Study by Dan Niven highlights challenges of reproducing research findings in critical care https://t.co/u4et7IKZCf
When replicated, less than half of ICU studies have reproducible effects. Is there sufficient description of study care processes to support replication efforts? https://t.co/BNdqiO2wsT
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @mdimairo: Reproducibility in critical care research: original studies reported larger effects than reproduction attempts. >50% of clini…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
HUGE. Proceed with caution in #ICU. #criticalcare https://t.co/kULNdf0iPW
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
RT @f_g_zampieri: This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed…
Super interesting findings. What’s next? https://t.co/eeUiVCQVpi
RT @otavio_ranzani: Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous finding…
This is just AMAZING. Initial studies usually overestimate effect size. In critical care, few interventions are confirmed after initial trials. @barttels2 @iceman_ex https://t.co/eseZMCMozw
Reproducibility in Critical Care trials from NEJM, Lancet, JAMA. Bottom line: -Attempt to reproduce a previous findings: 42% -Original studies reported larger effects -Inconsistency with the original: 56% @iwashyna @f_g_zampieri @msh_manu @DrDaleNeedham h
RT @BMCMedicine: Reproducibility of #clinical research in #critical care: a scoping #review https://t.co/U9QXzibnpd
RT @mdimairo: Reproducibility in critical care research: original studies reported larger effects than reproduction attempts. >50% of clini…
Reproducibility in critical care research: original studies reported larger effects than reproduction attempts. >50% of clinical practices with a reproduction attempt demonstrated effects that were inconsistent with the original study @PLOSMedicine http
#Reproducibility of #clinicalresearch in critical care: a scoping review https://t.co/sz2kfuqFjN #
RT @BMCMedicine: Reproducibility of #clinical research in #critical care: a scoping #review https://t.co/U9QXzibnpd
Reproducibility of #clinical research in #critical care: a scoping #review https://t.co/U9QXzibnpd