↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Published in
Journal of Biology, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/jbiol50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joerg Dietrich, Ruolan Han, Yin Yang, Margot Mayer-Pröschel, Mark Noble

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Neuroscience 24 15%
Psychology 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 15 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,233,441
of 13,988,947 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biology
#16
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,389
of 276,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,988,947 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them