↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness and acceptability of a Tele-Yoga intervention for people with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative findings from a controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
Title
Appropriateness and acceptability of a Tele-Yoga intervention for people with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative findings from a controlled pilot study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0540-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Selman, Kelly McDermott, DorAnne Donesky, Tracie Citron, Jill Howie-Esquivel

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent and associated with a large symptom burden, that is compounded in a dual HF-COPD diagnosis. Yoga has potential benefit for symptom relief; however functional impairment hinders access to usual yoga classes. We developed a Tele-Yoga intervention and evaluated it in a controlled pilot trial. This paper reports on the appropriateness and acceptability of the intervention and the evaluation design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 493 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Researcher 47 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 8%
Other 80 16%
Unknown 149 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 18%
Psychology 47 9%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 2%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 170 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,425,294
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#827
of 3,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,834
of 352,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#17
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.