↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness and acceptability of a Tele-Yoga intervention for people with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative findings from a controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Appropriateness and acceptability of a Tele-Yoga intervention for people with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative findings from a controlled pilot study
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0540-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Selman, Kelly McDermott, DorAnne Donesky, Tracie Citron, Jill Howie-Esquivel

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent and associated with a large symptom burden, that is compounded in a dual HF-COPD diagnosis. Yoga has potential benefit for symptom relief; however functional impairment hinders access to usual yoga classes. We developed a Tele-Yoga intervention and evaluated it in a controlled pilot trial. This paper reports on the appropriateness and acceptability of the intervention and the evaluation design.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 273 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 61 22%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 20%
Psychology 33 12%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 59 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,836,352
of 15,154,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#628
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,544
of 217,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,154,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them