↓ Skip to main content

Tobacco smoking and all-cause mortality in a large Australian cohort study: findings from a mature epidemic with current low smoking prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 4,083)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
86 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
319 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
36 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tobacco smoking and all-cause mortality in a large Australian cohort study: findings from a mature epidemic with current low smoking prevalence
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0281-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Banks, Grace Joshy, Marianne F Weber, Bette Liu, Robert Grenfell, Sam Egger, Ellie Paige, Alan D Lopez, Freddy Sitas, Valerie Beral

Abstract

The smoking epidemic in Australia is characterised by historic levels of prolonged smoking, heavy smoking, very high levels of long-term cessation, and low current smoking prevalence, with 13% of adults reporting that they smoked daily in 2013. Large-scale quantitative evidence on the relationship of tobacco smoking to mortality in Australia is not available despite the potential to provide independent international evidence about the contemporary risks of smoking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 319 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 245 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Master 20 8%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 78 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 26%
Psychology 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 88 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1022. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,885
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#26
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121
of 270,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.