↓ Skip to main content

Promoting research and audit at medical school: evaluating the educational impact of participation in a student-led national collaborative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 2,101)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
92 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Promoting research and audit at medical school: evaluating the educational impact of participation in a student-led national collaborative study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0326-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J Chapman, James C D Glasbey, Chetan Khatri, Michael Kelly, Dmitri Nepogodiev, Aneel Bhangu, J Edward F Fitzgerald

Abstract

Medical students often struggle to engage in extra-curricular research and audit. The Student Audit and Research in Surgery (STARSurg) network is a novel student-led, national research collaborative. Student collaborators contribute data to national, clinical studies while gaining an understanding of audit and research methodology and ethical principles. This study aimed to evaluate the educational impact of participation. Participation in the national, clinical project was supported with training interventions, including an academic training day, an online e-learning module, weekly discussion forums and YouTube® educational videos. A non-mandatory, online questionnaire assessed collaborators' self-reported confidence in performing key academic skills and their perceptions of audit and research prior to and following participation. The group completed its first national clinical study ("STARSurgUK") in 2013; 273 student collaborators participated across 109 hospital centres. Ninety-seven paired pre- and post-study participation responses (35.5%) were received (male = 51.5%; median age = 23). Participation led to increased confidence in key academic domains including: communication with local research governance bodies (p < 0.001), approaching clinical staff to initiate local collaboration (p < 0.001), data collection in a clinical setting (p < 0.001) and presentation of scientific results (p < 0.013). Collaborators also reported an increased appreciation of research, audit and study design (p < 0.001). Engagement with the STARSurg network empowered students to participate in a national clinical study, which increased their confidence and appreciation of academic principles and skills. Encouraging active participation in collaborative, student-led, national studies offers a novel approach for delivering essential academic training.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 26%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 22 31%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 46%
Unspecified 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#350,744
of 14,263,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#25
of 2,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,257
of 217,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,263,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them