↓ Skip to main content

A minimal markerset for three‐dimensional foot function assessment: measuring navicular drop and drift under dynamic conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
A minimal markerset for three‐dimensional foot function assessment: measuring navicular drop and drift under dynamic conditions
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13047-018-0257-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patric Eichelberger, Angela Blasimann, Nicole Lutz, Fabian Krause, Heiner Baur

Abstract

The validity of predicting foot pronation occurring mainly at the midfoot by surrogate measures from the rearfoot, like eversion excursion, is limited. The dynamic navicular mobility in terms of vertical navicular drop (dNDrop) and medial navicular drift (dNDrift) may be regarded as meaningful clinical indicators to represent overall foot function. This study aimed to develop a minimal approach to measure the two parameters and to examine their intra- and interday reliability during walking. The minimal markerset uses markers at the lateral and medial caput of the 1st and 5th metatarsals, respectively, at the dorsal calcaneus and at the tuberosity of the navicular bone. Dynamic navicular drop and drift were assessed with three-dimensional motion capture in 21 healthy individuals using a single-examiner test-retest study design. Intra- and interday repeatability were 1.1 mm (ICC21 0.97) and 2.3 mm (ICC21 0.87) for dynamic navicular drop and 1.5 mm (ICC21 0.96) and 5.3 mm (ICC21 0.46) for dynamic navicular drift. The contribution of instrumental errors was estimated to 0.25 mm for dynamic navicular drop and 0.86 mm for dynamic navicular drift. Interday reliability was generally worse than intraday reliability primary due to day-to-day variations in movement patterns and the contribution of instrumental errors was below 23% for dynamic navicular drop but reached 57% for dynamic navicular drift. The minimal markerset allows to simply transfer the known concepts of navicular drop and drift from quasi-static clinical test conditions to functional tasks, which is recommended to more closely relate assessments to the functional behavior of the foot.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 11%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 30 36%