RT @OxEBHC_SR: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/ZvGbXmbY2C #sysre…
RT @uct_hsl: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/i9YW4YNbjM #sysrevsj
RT @uct_hsl: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/i9YW4YNbjM #sysrevsj
RT @uct_hsl: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/i9YW4YNbjM #sysrevsj
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/i9YW4YNbjM #sysrevsj
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/ZvGbXmbY2C #sysrevsj
‘What happened previously when intervention implemented?’ surely only question a SR can answer? @petticrewmark https://t.co/ukXFfL8n82
RT @MaritaHennessy: Link to @petticrewmark's paper mentioned by @James_M_Thomas https://t.co/pqQFptTawX #cochraneconf17 @hrbtmrn https://t.…
Link to @petticrewmark's paper mentioned by @James_M_Thomas https://t.co/pqQFptTawX #cochraneconf17 @hrbtmrn https://t.co/2wvkO6UAvy
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/x12wqDnVM6 #sysrevsj
RT @DrAPitman: For your next #systematicreview - new approaches to try out @LSHTMpress https://t.co/8yzH1Men4V #sysrevsj
For your next #systematicreview - new approaches to try out @LSHTMpress https://t.co/8yzH1Men4V #sysrevsj
RT @BertVrijhoef: We may be significantly under- valuing what qualitative studies can bring to systematic reviews https://t.co/lI1yeaXQNq
We may be significantly under- valuing what qualitative studies can bring to systematic reviews https://t.co/lI1yeaXQNq
RT @Treasa_corbett: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/mvWab1lb1q #sy…
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ https://t.co/mvWab1lb1q #sysrevs
@JoG13 @petticrewmark THAT Petticrew paper : ) https://t.co/RJa7UknkLg
@123canary sorry about that: http://t.co/3shvIPLUv6
RT @narrowboat_paul: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/xbrwXpXkIt #Sy…
Dr. Mark Pettigrew asks "Is it time to rethink the systematic review catechism?:. Important, challenging question. http://t.co/EOOfrKQ9d9
Moving from what works to what happens. http://t.co/qi60taO1xK
There is a rich agenda for methodological research to make systematic reviews more efficient & meaningful - #SysRevs: http://t.co/ms2dU2N6ta
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/xbrwXpXkIt #SysRevs @MedicalEvidence
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @Lucy_Gilson: Excellent piece for #hpsr Reflecting on challenges for and new ideas about systematic reviews http://t.co/1eB1cNOfK0 by @…
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
RT @equitylist: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/uU1vb7yVaT
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/O3JaPEvmWZ via @KristofDecoste1
RT @ValeryRidde: "changes in complex systems cannot be understood by simply asking whether they work" @Anthony_Lact http://t.co/GVQuod6pQ3 …
RT @ValeryRidde: "changes in complex systems cannot be understood by simply asking whether they work" @Anthony_Lact http://t.co/GVQuod6pQ3 …
RT @AlexClark1944: Via @realisteval:Time to rethink systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/Hygo…
RT @AlexClark1944: Via @realisteval:Time to rethink systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/Hygo…
RT @AlexClark1944: Via @realisteval:Time to rethink systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/Hygo…
RT @AlexClark1944: Via @realisteval:Time to rethink systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/Hygo…
Via @realisteval:Time to rethink systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/HygoSUDmr0 #qualitative
RT @realisteval: Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/UzqMA3fy60
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens http://t.co/UzqMA3fy60
RT @Lucy_Gilson: Excellent piece for #hpsr Reflecting on challenges for and new ideas about systematic reviews http://t.co/1eB1cNOfK0 by @…
RT @Lucy_Gilson: Excellent piece for #hpsr Reflecting on challenges for and new ideas about systematic reviews http://t.co/1eB1cNOfK0 by @…
Excellent piece for #hpsr Reflecting on challenges for and new ideas about systematic reviews http://t.co/1eB1cNOfK0 by @petticrewmark
RT @ValeryRidde: "changes in complex systems cannot be understood by simply asking whether they work" @Anthony_Lact http://t.co/GVQuod6pQ3 …
RT @ValeryRidde: "changes in complex systems cannot be understood by simply asking whether they work" @Anthony_Lact http://t.co/GVQuod6pQ3 …
"changes in complex systems cannot be understood by simply asking whether they work" @Anthony_Lact http://t.co/GVQuod6pQ3 by @petticrewmark
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @CairneyPaul: I like @petticrewmark 's article on systematic review partly because it makes my life easier http://t.co/6wTJl3yzk8
RT @CairneyPaul: I like @petticrewmark 's article on systematic review partly because it makes my life easier http://t.co/6wTJl3yzk8
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
I like @petticrewmark 's article on systematic review partly because it makes my life easier http://t.co/6wTJl3yzk8
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
RT @AlisonOMara: Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http…
Paper by @petticrewmark about rethinking SRs is timely & I largely agree, esp. the bit about excluding 'weak' studies http://t.co/h1Y2YN7oMR
RT @KateinLeeds: With complex progs, the Q "does it work?" is "often meaningless & usually unanswerable" Rethinking systematic reviews http…
With complex progs, the Q "does it work?" is "often meaningless & usually unanswerable" Rethinking systematic reviews http://t.co/AyKYY2j2oV
http://t.co/GYiaOWxLdS Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ #systematicreviews
http://t.co/GYiaOWxLdS Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ #systematicreviews
Is transparency the only non-negotiable principle of systematic reviews? @petticrewmark in http://t.co/fggFUpSR8j
When sys reviews don't need to test hypotheses. Imp challenges from @petticrewmark http://t.co/e83K6jE8wb
When sys reviews don't need to test hypotheses. Imp challenges from @petticrewmark http://t.co/e83K6jE8wb
When sys reviews don't need to test hypotheses. Imp challenges from @petticrewmark http://t.co/e83K6jE8wb
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Great article on systematic reviews: Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ http://t.co/kQuMTD1ocz #via #SysRevs @MedicalEvidence
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
Why we need to broaden the range of questions systematic reviews address: http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @CASPUK #EvidenceSynthesis #WhatWorks
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
Only just got to read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/TL1pGvclgY
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
CASPers - read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/eCT7akMCR6
Only just got to read this important piece in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechism http://t.co/TL1pGvclgY
Systematic review protocols need to be flexible and up to date with current thinking about evidence synthesis: http://t.co/2IlEEpDJ5j
Systematic review protocols need to be flexible and up to date with current thinking about evidence synthesis: http://t.co/2IlEEpDJ5j
Systematic review protocols need to be flexible and up to date with current thinking about evidence synthesis: http://t.co/2IlEEpDJ5j
Systematic review protocols need to be flexible and up to date with current thinking about evidence synthesis: http://t.co/2IlEEpDJ5j
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ #systematicreview http://t.co/gcnutEGPAt
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/cKT7k5Salg HT @trishgreenhalgh
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/cKT7k5Salg HT @trishgreenhalgh
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/cKT7k5Salg HT @trishgreenhalgh
Systematic reviews: Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @mirandacumpston #SystematicReviews
Systematic reviews: Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @mirandacumpston #SystematicReviews
Systematic reviews: Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. http://t.co/ew6AlVprXA HT @mirandacumpston #SystematicReviews
April's most read article in #SysRevs: Mark Petticrew on rethinking systematic review catechisms: http://t.co/B2iwQ4tBJB