| Title |
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-015-0040-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin M Featherstone, Donna M Dryden, Michelle Foisy, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Matthew D Mitchell, Robin A Paynter, Karen A Robinson, Craig A Umscheid, Lisa Hartling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 20% |
| Canada | 13 | 15% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 52% |
| Scientists | 23 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#786,425
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#97
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,261
of 280,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.