↓ Skip to main content

Development of a multi-dimensional measure of resilience in adolescents: the Adolescent Resilience Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Development of a multi-dimensional measure of resilience in adolescents: the Adolescent Resilience Questionnaire
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre Gartland, Lyndal Bond, Craig A Olsson, Simone Buzwell, Susan M Sawyer

Abstract

The concept of resilience has captured the imagination of researchers and policy makers over the past two decades. However, despite the ever growing body of resilience research, there is a paucity of relevant, comprehensive measurement tools. In this article, the development of a theoretically based, comprehensive multi-dimensional measure of resilience in adolescents is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 295 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 67 22%
Unknown 73 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 95 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 13%
Social Sciences 33 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 79 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,498
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,962
of 132,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.