↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
907 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1014 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin J Greaves, Kate E Sheppard, Charles Abraham, Wendy Hardeman, Michael Roden, Philip H Evans, Peter Schwarz, The IMAGE Study Group

Abstract

To develop more efficient programmes for promoting dietary and/or physical activity change (in order to prevent type 2 diabetes) it is critical to ensure that the intervention components and characteristics most strongly associated with effectiveness are included. The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to identify intervention components that are associated with increased change in diet and/or physical activity in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,014 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 987 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 183 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 16%
Researcher 130 13%
Student > Bachelor 127 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 5%
Other 189 19%
Unknown 171 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 17%
Psychology 170 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 109 11%
Social Sciences 93 9%
Sports and Recreations 87 9%
Other 160 16%
Unknown 220 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#432,173
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#387
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,351
of 124,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.