↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of two-stage open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of two-stage open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tung-Yi Lin, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Meng-Ling Lu, Chi-Chien Niu, Ming-Kai Hsieh, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Po-Liang Lai, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 18%
Other 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 58%
Unspecified 9 24%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,907,899
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#431
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,381
of 232,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them