| Title |
Comparison of two-stage open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tung-Yi Lin, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Meng-Ling Lu, Chi-Chien Niu, Ming-Kai Hsieh, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Po-Liang Lai, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 50% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,174,441
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#832
of 4,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,158
of 353,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#15
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.