↓ Skip to main content

Mapping biomass with remote sensing: a comparison of methods for the case study of Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Mapping biomass with remote sensing: a comparison of methods for the case study of Uganda
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-6-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerio Avitabile, Martin Herold, Matieu Henry, Christiane Schmullius

Abstract

Assessing biomass is gaining increasing interest mainly for bioenergy, climate change research and mitigation activities, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+). In response to these needs, a number of biomass/carbon maps have been recently produced using different approaches but the lack of comparable reference data limits their proper validation. The objectives of this study are to compare the available maps for Uganda and to understand the sources of variability in the estimation. Uganda was chosen as a case-study because it presents a reliable national biomass reference dataset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 237 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 95 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 12%
Engineering 15 6%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,375,151
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#109
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,221
of 135,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them