A peerless review? Automating methodological and statistical review
BioMed Central blog,
Despite occasionally coming under fire, pre-publication peer review remains the primary method of quality control in scholarly…
Peer Review Week
Discussions – F1000 Research,
This week F1000Research joins ORCID, ScienceOpen, Wiley, and the wider scientific community in a new initiative aimed at…
Why we need a journal on research integrity and peer review
BioMed Central blog,
Research affects our lives. It is the basis for medical decisions and it affects everything from the food we eat to the device…
Reject, revise, accept: Becoming Reviewer #2
Tenure, She Wrote,
Paper reviewing is one of those weird aspects of professional development that academics are rarely taught to do. Most of us are…
Reject, revise, accept: Becoming Reviewer #2
Tenure, She Wrote,
Paper reviewing is one of those weird aspects of professional development that academics are rarely taught to do. Most of us are…
When the language distracts from the science: Reviewing, NES, and NoNES
The Contemplative Mammoth,
Training in academia is often trial-by-fire, and learning how to review manuscripts is no exception. Because you’re technically…
When the language distracts from the science: Reviewing, NES, and NoNES
The Contemplative Mammoth,
Training in academia is often trial-by-fire, and learning how to review manuscripts is no exception. Because you’re technically…
Painful publishing – whose fault?
BioMed Central,
In the five years since the publication of the ‘Painful publishing’ letter in Science by Martin Raff , Alexander Johnson and…
Sustainable Chemical Processes – a new journal from Chemistry Central
Chemistry Central blog,
We are pleased to announce a new open access journal from Chemistry Central, Sustainable Chemical Processes, which will cover…
Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?
MolBio Research Highlights,
Virgina Walbot has recently published an article in…